Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Variant-Specific Rewiring of Lysosomal Positioning by STARD9 Produces Opposite Cholesterol Trafficking Outcomes

Created on 28 Sep 2026

Authors

Dianatpour, M., Banerjee, D., Kim, H., Moon, J., Zhu, R., Zhou, H., Neogi, A., Rugira, T., Mane, S., Adeniran, A., Paliuqi, B., Lee, H.-J., Ohno-Machado, L., Mani, A.

Abstract

Residual cardiovascular risk persists despite lipid-lowering therapy, independent of LDL and Lp(a), reflecting cholesterol dysregulation. We identify STARD9, a lysosomal cholesterol-sensing kinesin, as a causal gene for divergent familial dyslipidemias and premature atherosclerosis. Its START domain binds cholesterol to govern lysosomal positioning. Rare variants segregate with autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia and premature coronary disease, while common variants associate with reduced HDL and elevated triglycerides. Both converge on lysosomal cholesterol sequestration, ER depletion, mTORC1 SREBP2 activation, impaired autophagy, and NF-kB inflammation, yet diverge through opposite lysosomal positioning: the rare variant disperses lysosomes peripherally, phenocopying START domain loss across cholesterol sequestration, lysosomal positioning, and TFEB activation, triggering LDLR degradation and CASM/TFEB-dependent efflux that preserves HDL, whereas the common variant causes perinuclear retention that suppresses TFEB dependent lipid-handling transcripts, yielding hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL. In Stard9-knockout mice, enterocyte cholesterol sequestration drives SREBP2 dependent NPC1L1 upregulation and apical localization, increasing intestinal cholesterol absorption. These findings position lysosomal cholesterol trafficking as a targetable node in statin-refractory cardiovascular disease.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 28 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement