Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel Targets Pulmonary Neutrophils

Created on 29 Sep 2026

Authors

Majumder, A., Jeong, S., Zamora, M., Marzolini, N., Wang, Y., Nong, J., Brysgel, T., Patel, P., Zaleski, M., Wu, J., Stabler, C., Chase, L., Wang, Z., Morrisey, E., Muzykantov, V., Ferguson, L., Brenner, J., Contreras, O., Myerson, J.

Abstract

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (Abraxane) was among the first clinically approved nanomedicines and is a first-line chemotherapeutic. It enhances therapeutic efficacy and reduces side effects of paclitaxel. Despite its extensive clinical use, mechanisms of Abraxane's therapeutic effects are the subject of ongoing study. This work posits a new mechanism for Abraxane's effects in lung cancers and metastasis. Tracing the albumin component of Abraxane with radioisotopes or fluorophores, we find that Abraxane homes to the lungs. Abraxane's lung tropism is elevated by inflammation and is eliminated in complement protein C3 knockout mice, showing that complement pathway drives the uptake. Flow cytometry and histology show that neutrophils are the dominant cell type taking up Abraxane in the lungs. We demonstrate Abraxane's tropism to pulmonary neutrophils in mice and in human donor lungs. We note previously undocumented side effects associated with Abraxane's lung tropism, including pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory responses in acute lung inflammation. We show that Abraxane's efficacy against lung metastases is affected when lung uptake is eliminated by C3 knockout. Our results provide insight into why Abraxane is effective in lung cancer and metastases. These findings may be used to improve outcomes in patients receiving Abraxane and help design next-generation cancer nanomedicines.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 29 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement