Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

ScProteoAgent enables natural-language-driven single-cell proteomics analysis and interpretation

Created on 30 Sep 2026

Authors

Hu, R., Ding, K., Wang, W., Zhu, Z., Chen, P., Wang, S., Wang, Y.

Abstract

Single-cell proteomics requires computational choices to remain aligned with experimental design as research questions evolve. Here we present ScProteoAgent, which translates natural-language requests into domain-specific calculations and preserves research intent, analysis design, matrix-processing history and statistical outputs as reusable analytical state. Follow-up requests reuse applicable inputs and initiate new calculations when contrasts or experimental units change. We assembled a benchmark comprising 55 tasks and 33 reference conclusions from 11 published studies, combining progressive questions within studies with complementary biological and analytical settings. In a retrospective comparison of 88 archived outputs from eight systems, ScProteoAgent achieved the highest mean score of 93.67 under a common six-dimensional rule-based evaluation. A HeLa migration case connected phenotype composition with proteomic clusters, candidate differences and original-observation support. In liver zonation, a researcher-guided follow-up reused a saved matrix to test mouse-level spatial contrasts and compare full-matrix and observed-only results. Applications in brain development, sample preservation and hematopoiesis illustrated how interpretation depends on processing choices and experimental units. ScProteoAgent connects research questions with statistical results and their analytical context, enabling existing analyses to support more specific biological investigations.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 30 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 71
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement