Authors
Du, Y., Li, S., Yang, X., Shu, H., Wang, Z., Zhang, D., Zou, Q., Yuan, Z.
Abstract
Preprocessing of spatial transcriptomics (ST) count matrices is critical for removing technical variation while preserving biological signals, but optimal strategies remain unclear across diverse platforms. We systematically benchmarked 371 preprocessing workflows across 45 data spanning 11 mainstream ST platforms, evaluating their performance using specifically designed complementary metrics. To further assess preprocessing factors upstream of count-matrix generation, we additionally evaluated image preprocessing, including cell segmentation and post-segmentation transcript processing, across representative imaging-based ST platforms. We found that no universal count-matrix preprocessing workflow performed optimally across all platforms, while data from the same platforms exhibited striking consistency in optimal count-matrix preprocessing workflows. We identified the key data structure characteristics and count-matrix preprocessing steps that critically influence preprocessing performance. We developed platform-specific and data structure-guided recommendations to assist users in selecting the optimal count-matrix preprocessing workflow, validated across a broader range of downstream tasks. We demonstrated that our data-driven recommendations uncover subtle biologically meaningful spatial patterns in new data that were obscured by suboptimal count-matrix preprocessing. Our findings suggest best practices for ST data count-matrix preprocessing.
Preprint server:
bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 30 Sep 2026.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 14
- Comments 0