Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Mapping a genome-scale in vivo knockout screen to a mechanistic network model identifies VAV2, RASA1, and LEPR as regulators of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy

Created on 30 Sep 2026

Authors

Watkins, L. D., Saucerman, J. J.

Abstract

Cardiomyocyte hypertrophy is a leading clinical predictor of heart failure, yet newly identified candidate genes often remain disconnected from the signaling mechanisms that govern cardiomyocyte growth. We developed a computational-experimental pipeline that integrates genome-scale mouse knockout phenotypes with a logic-based differential equation model of hypertrophic signaling. Among 9,605 genes evaluated by the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium, 939 knockout lines induced abnormal heart morphology. Directional curation of hypertrophy-related sub-phenotypes followed by interaction-based network expansion mapped 37 genes to the signaling model. Virtual knockdown screening identified five candidates with concordant in vivo and in silico effects: LRIG1 and CBL as predicted negative regulators and VAV2, RASA1, and LEPR as predicted positive regulators. Mechanistic subnetwork analysis linked these candidates to distinct receptor-proximal, Ras, PI3K-AKT, and MAPK signaling axes. In neonatal rat cardiomyocytes, siRNA-mediated depletion of VAV2, RASA1, or LEPR reduced phenylephrine-induced cell growth, supporting their cell-autonomous contribution to hypertrophy. Quantitative phenotyping further validated the predicted decreased cardiac hypertrophy for VAV2 and LEPR knockouts but identified potential age-dependent mechanisms for RASA1 knockout. Overall, this study establishes the application of network models to translate from in vivo phenotypic screens into pathway mechanisms.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 30 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement