Mapping the response of primary human chondrocytes to an osteoarthritis-relevant stimulus by single-cell RNA sequencing

Authors

Stuppy, S. R., Shine, J., D'Costa, S., Fernandez Davila, J. G., Yanke, A. B., Loeser, R. F., Burgess, J. D., Phanstiel, D. H., Diekman, B. O.

Abstract

Objective: To determine how fibronectin fragment (Fn-f), a matrikine that induces an osteoarthritis (OA)-like phenotype, reshapes chondrocyte states and transcriptional programs at single-cell resolution. Design: Primary human ankle chondrocytes from two cadaveric donors without OA were treated with PBS or purified recombinant Fn-f for 18 hours and profiled by single-cell RNA sequencing. Transcriptional states were characterized by marker genes and functional enrichment, compared with classifications used for OA chondrocytes, and evaluated for Fn-f-dependent changes in abundance and transcriptional programs. Results: Five transcriptionally distinct populations were identified with features that matched previous classifications of effector, inflammatory, pre-hypertrophic/fibrochondrocyte, reparative, and homeostatic chondrocytes. Fn-f markedly redistributed cells among these states, enriching inflammatory chondrocytes while reducing effector and reparative populations. Within transcriptional states, Fn-f differentially altered matrix/cartilage, inflammatory, and stress/immediate-early programs. These responses did not uniformly correspond to assigned subtype identities, demonstrating that transcriptional programs can be dynamically deployed across chondrocyte states. Conclusions: Controlled perturbations of healthy chondrocytes complement observational OA atlases by resolving stimulus-dependent changes in chondrocyte state abundance and transcriptional programs. Discordance between subtype annotations and dynamic functional programs further highlights the need for harmonized definitions of chondrocytes across phenotypic states.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 01 Oct 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.