Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Memory-based and surround-based pattern completion show distinct laminar profiles in human V1

Created on 01 Oct 2026

Authors

Zhang, Z., Abbatecola, C., Huang, Y., Lazarova, Y. Y., Paton, A., Wimber, M., Levelt, C. N., Larkum, M. E., Muckli, L. F., Petro, L. S.

Abstract

Visual input is often incomplete, requiring the brain to infer missing information from prior experience or contextual cues. Establishing whether memory-derived and context-derived information shape pattern completion through shared or distinct top-down pathways is central to understanding how perception emerges from the integration of sensory input and prior knowledge. Across two experiments, we used 7T layer fMRI to measure activity in an occluded region of human V1 while participants viewed natural scenes. Memory-based completion was enabled by varying the level of exposure to full scene images before scanning, while surround-based completion was implemented via two scenes that were repeatedly presented in partially occluded form but never seen intact. In both fMRI experiments, category decoding in the occluded V1 region only emerged after multiple prior exposures, whereas novel scenes did not show reliable decoding. Repeated partially occluded scenes also supported decoding, despite the hidden region never being shown, consistent with surround-based pattern completion. Critically, mnemonic and surround-based pattern completion showed opposite laminar decoding profiles across V1 depths, with mnemonic feedback dominating deep layers, and surround-based feedback dominating superficial layers. Together, these findings suggest that completion in the early visual cortex depends on the sources of inferred information, revealing dissociable feedback pathways for memory- and context-driven inference.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 01 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement