Authors
Reed, L. S., Messaritaki, E., Hedge, C., Hodgetts, C. J., McNabb, C. B., Jones, D. K., Lawrence, A. D.
Abstract
Why are some individuals able to recollect past events and imagine future events more richly than others? Here we examine how structural connectivity within a 'core network' supporting mnemonic cognition, substantially overlapping with the canonical default network, underpins inter-individual variation in autobiographical thought. We analysed state-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging data from 109 adults collected on a high-gradient 3T Connectom scanner, in relation to their Survey of Autobiographical Memory (SAM) scores - a psychometric measure of self-reported episodic autobiographical, semantic, spatial, and future thinking abilities. We anatomically defined a core network, employed streamline tractography to derive participant-specific structural brain networks, and weighted their connections with the myelin water fraction derived from quantitative multicomponent relaxometry. We investigated associations between graph theoretical metrics of the core network and self-reported mnemonic abilities. We found a negative association between future thinking abilities and characteristic path length, and a positive association between future thinking abilities and mean clustering coefficient. Further analysis showed that the node-specific clustering coefficient of most core network nodes was positively correlated with future thinking scores, with frontotemporal nodes showing the strongest associations. Our findings indicate that both efficient integration and local segregation of the core network are important for trait-level future thinking.
Preprint server:
bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 02 Oct 2026.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 11
- Comments 0