Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Coexistence of annual plants under competition and reproductive interference

Created on 02 Oct 2026

Authors

Shinohara, N., Yamawo, A., Katsuhara, K.

Abstract

In natural ecosystems, community dynamics are driven by diverse interactions operating through both ecological and reproductive processes. Although theory predicts that these processes jointly generate complex and contingent dynamics through the interplay of stabilizing (negative frequency dependence arising from niche differences) and destabilizing effects (positive frequency dependence caused by reproductive interference), empirical tests of this prediction remain scarce. Here, we combined experimental and theoretical approaches to investigate the dynamics of two congeneric annual plant species (Commelina) experiencing both ecological competition and reproductive interference. Our empirically parameterized model revealed a large niche difference and mutual reproductive interference. However, the reproductive interference was not strong enough to generate pronounced contingency of community dynamics on initial conditions. Instead, coexistence was the most likely outcome regardless of initial species composition. Parameter exploration indicated that the weak contingency arose because reproductive assurance strategies of Commelina species buffered the minority disadvantage caused by reproductive interference. These findings provide empirical evidence that reproductive interference does not necessarily destabilize coexistence and that it may be outweighed by ecological niche and fitness differences. Our study highlights the importance of integrating ecological and reproductive processes towards better prediction of community dynamics.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 02 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 16
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement