Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Seizures in a Dravet Syndrome mouse model inhibit the locus coeruleus but locally evoke supraphysiologic norepinephrine release

Created on 02 Oct 2026

Authors

Zhao, M., Demetriou, Y., Noor, A., Barden, J., Zhu, L., Yu, Q., Sajdak, A., Akhaury, A., Rana, C., Yang, P., Li, Y., Burgess, C., McKenzie, S., Kramer, P., Mattis, J. H.

Abstract

Locus coeruleus (LC) neurons are the primary source of norepinephrine / noradrenaline (NE) released to most brain structures, including seizure-prone neocortical and limbic regions. LC-NE networks regulate numerous physiological processes, including arousal, attention, and memory. Previous evidence suggests that LC-NE neurons may be involved in epilepsy and that their activation may have therapeutic effects on seizures, but the endogenous activity of the LC-NE network during seizures remains largely unclear. We combined electrocorticography recordings and in vivo imaging to measure somatic activity of LC-NE neurons as well as downstream NE release during hyperthermia-induced seizures in a well-characterized pre-clinical model of Dravet Syndrome. We found that population LC-NE somatic activity was inhibited during seizures, whereas downstream NE release was dramatically elevated. To reconcile these discordant findings, we established that activation of downstream regions is capable of locally evoking NE release, in part via activation of glutamate receptors, consistent with the Glutamate Amplifies Noradrenergic Effects (GANE) model. Finally, we confirmed that ictal NE release occurred across additional downstream brain regions, epilepsy models, and seizure induction methods. Thus, disruption of NE signaling is likely a widespread ictal signature, with implications for impaired consciousness during and after seizures.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 02 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement