Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

High-throughput functional genomics and transcriptomics reveal molecular mechanisms regulating the synergistic fungicidal activity of copper and zinc

Created on 06 Oct 2026

Authors

Kerkaert, J. D., Carvalho, R., Schnirman, R. E., Wu, C. X. Y., Reyes-Chavez, B., Zhang, Y., Koker, M. K. A., Smieska, L. M., Huberman, L. B.

Abstract

Fungal diseases cause devastating crop infestations and millions of deaths annually. To improve disease treatment development, we must understand the biological processes these treatments target and the fungal cellular responses they elicit. Current methods to identify genetic responses of fungi to antifungal drugs and fungicides typically involve laborious molecular genetics experiments or transcriptomics. We utilized high-throughput screens in the basidiomycete yeast Rhodotorula (Rhodosporidium) toruloides to rapidly identify genes associated with the fungal response to a copper-zinc fungicide developed by VM Agritech and compared identified genes to those transcriptionally activated in response to the fungicide in R. toruloides and the filamentous ascomycete Neurospora crassa. These 'omics technologies combined with molecular genetics and biochemical analyses showed copper and zinc synergize to inhibit fungal growth due, at least in part, to an increase in cellular zinc concentrations when copper is present. Intriguingly, although we identified genes involved in the copper-zinc fungicide response using both high-throughput screens and transcriptomics, there was little overlap in genes identified through the two methods. Our findings demonstrate the power of combining functional genomics and transcriptomics approaches in identifying a more comprehensive map of the genetic mechanisms necessary for responding to fungicides.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 06 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 18
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement