Inverse relationship between mitochondrial and non-coding nuclear DNA content in free-living kinetoplastids

Authors

Zavadska, D., Olifirov, B., Packer, J., Tashyreva, D., Kamikawa, R., Simpson, A. G. B., Richter, D. J.

Abstract

The evolution of genome size and eukaryotic genome organisation has puzzled evolutionary biologists for decades. Are differences in DNA content and protein-coding capacity of eukaryotic genomes a result of natural selection, or neutral processes? If they were shaped by natural selection, which features might be connected with these differences: cell volume, ecological strategy, availability of nutrients, etc.? Kinetoplastids are protists with compact nuclear genomes that almost entirely lack introns, but whose mitochondrial DNA content (kDNA) can rival that of their nuclei. We hypothesised that the reduction in non-protein coding nuclear DNA content during the evolution of kinetoplastids is connected with an increase in kDNA content: species with larger fractions of total cellular DNA that is allocated to kDNA will have concomitantly smaller fractions of non-coding DNA in the nuclear genome. We developed a framework for estimation of DNA content in both the mitochondria and nuclei from quantitative fluorescence microscopy data, and inferred the fraction of non-coding DNA in nuclear genomes based on the combination of transcriptomic and fluorescence imaging data. Across 10 genetically distant isolates from diverse free-living kinetoplastid lineages, there is indeed a trend towards a lower proportion of non-protein-coding nuclear DNA when kDNA proportion is higher relative to the total DNA in the cell. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that in free-living kinetoplastids, mitochondrial and nuclear genomes might co-evolve in terms of their DNA content. This finding raises the possibility that natural selection acts on genome size evolution in kinetoplastids, and contributes evidence and methodology to address this question more broadly in eukaryotes.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 07 Oct 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.