Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Using a 3-step semi-automated image analysis pipeline to quantify differences in VE-cadherin junction morphology in lymphatic endothelial cells in vitro

Created on 07 Oct 2026

Authors

Larson, S. M., Feller, A. K., Whittington, C. F.

Abstract

Lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) function is strongly tied to transitions between button- and zipper-like junctions that control fluid flow into vessels. Published methods quantifying junction morphology are limited to single cell analysis or use few quantitative metrics to describe junctions across LEC monolayers. Therefore, a novel 3-step image analysis pipeline was developed to identify new metrics that quantify differences in button- and zipper-like junctions in LECs. The pipeline used Cellpose, CellProfiler, and Fiji to analyze VE-cadherin expression across lymphatic vessels within a 3D microfluidic chip and quantify VE-cadherin radial intensity, number of objects, object size, branchpoints, end-points, and junction thickness. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- exposure produced but-ton-like junctions, and unexposed cells were zippered. Radial intensity was heightened at the cell membrane in zipper-like junctions while perinuclear intensity increased for but-ton-like junctions. Increased branchpoints, endpoints, objects per cell, and junction thick-ness were associated with junction buttoning, while increased object size was associated with junction zippering. Principle component analysis results reinforced these trends and identified metric combinations that represented each junctional state. Overall, this semi-automated pipeline quantified differences in VE-cadherin junction morphology across LEC monolayers and generated new quantitative metrics to expand the tools available for studying junction morphology in lymphatic vasculature.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 07 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement