Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

digimouth: a Python package for modeling aroma release in food science

Created on 07 Oct 2026

Authors

Peltier, C., Mourabit, O., Coulibaly, K., Andriot, I., Trelea, I. C.

Abstract

The modeling of aroma release in food science is a complex, multidisciplinary field integrating mass transfer theory and principles of physical chemistry. While mechanistic models have long been used to understand volatile release, their practical adoption has been hindered because existing implementations are often private, "in-house" tools that lack reproducibility and extensibility. This paper introduces digimouth, an open-source Python framework designed to provide a unified, modular, and reproducible environment for simulating and fitting aroma release kinetics. A key innovation of digimouth is its handling of events and stages. Events represent discrete, instantaneous changes in the system (such as opening a bottle or swallowing), while stages allow for multi-phase simulations where experimental conditions or physical dynamics change over time. To demonstrate the tool's utility, the authors implemented established in vitro convection models and performed sensitivity analyses on parameters such as air-water partition coefficients and mass transfer coefficients. The package also includes an optimization module based on the least-squares method to fit parameters to experimental data. Validation against real-time data from Proton Transfer Reaction-Time of Flight- Mass Spectrometry (PTR-ToF-MS) shows a satisfactory fit, with an average error of approximately 2%. Ultimately, digimouth facilitates robust model development and hypothesis testing, offering the food science community a collaborative tool to better understand the mechanisms of flavor release.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 07 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement