Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Genetic dissection of grafting traits reveals regulators of graft union formation in grapevine

Created on 07 Oct 2026

Authors

Camboue, M., Morel, M., Zehraoui, E., Lafargue, M., Hevin, C., Hocquard, N., Tandonnet, J.-P., Ollat, N., Marguerit, E., Cookson, S. J.

Abstract

Understanding how grafts form has fascinated scientists for over a century, and numerous transcription regulators involved in wound healing, callus formation, and grafting have been identified in model plants. However, the genetic architecture underlying grafting traits remains poorly characterized. To address this gap, we aimed to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with grafting success rates and grafting-related traits (including callus formation, mechanical strength of the graft union, and post-grafting growth) in a grapevine rootstock mapping population, Vitis berlandieri x V. rupestris. Although no QTLs were identified for grafting success rate, QTLs were identified for component traits revealing a genetic architecture that would have remained hidden when considering grafting success as a single composite phenotype. By integrating QTL and transcriptome data, we identified regulators potentially mediating grafting-related traits. We then showed that one transcription factor that regulates callus formation and grafting in Arabidopsis potentially has a similar role in grapevine by silencing with exogenous double-stranded RNAs and that exogenous application of methyl jasmonate increases callus development at the graft interface. Candidate transcriptional regulators located within QTLs and evidence from gene silencing and hormone treatments suggest the conservation of regulatory mechanisms underlying wound-induced callus formation across plant species.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 07 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement