Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Predicted structure of the 89-kDa invasion-tip protein of Holospora obtusa, an endonuclear symbiont of Paramecium caudatum, suggests a pH-dependent conformational change

Created on 11 Oct 2026

Authors

Takenaka, Y., Murai, T., Nakatsu, T., Shigeri, Y., Fujishima, M.

Abstract

The endonuclear symbiont Holospora obtusa invades the macronucleus of Paramecium caudatum using an infectious-form invasion-tip containing a major 89-kDa periplasmic protein implicated in escape from the host digestive vacuole and macronuclear invasion. Sequence-based analyses placed this protein within a Holospora-specific family and predicted an N-terminal membrane-anchoring module and a long alpha-helical C-terminal region. AlphaFold2 modeling followed by molecular dynamics indicated that the C-terminal region forms an antiparallel, spectrin-repeat-like helical solenoid containing a localized three-helix coiled-coil. The protein exhibits a large pH-dependent charge difference, becoming 55 units more positive at pH 4 than at pH 7. Independent simulations at these pH values differed mainly in the relative orientation of the N-terminal core and C-terminal rod, described by DynDom as an approximately 35 degrees rigid-body rotation about a hinge centered on Gly291. However, none of the nearby glutamates (Glu273, Glu275, and Glu302) formed a pH-dependent salt bridge, and no specific protonation-dependent interaction responsible for the conformational difference was identified. We nonetheless propose, as a testable hypothesis, that acidification of the digestive vacuole may promote this reorientation, thereby repositioning the N-terminal membrane-anchoring module at the bacterial surface as an early step toward escape from the vacuole.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 11 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement