Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Chain-Length-Dependent Interactions of Polyethylene Nanoplastics with Human Catalase reveals Size based Nanoplastic Toxicity

Created on 12 Oct 2026

Authors

Tanaya, S., Rath, S. L.

Abstract

Nanoplastic contamination is increasingly recognized as a biochemical stressor, yet the molecular determinants governing how polymer fragment size dictates protein-level interactions remain poorly understood. Here, we combine molecular docking and all-atom molecular dynamics simulations to characterize the interaction of polyethylene (PE) oligomers of increasing length (n = 3, 5, 7, and 14 repeat units) with human catalase, a tetrameric heme enzyme central to cellular antioxidant defense. Single-chain simulations reveal that short PE fragments (3-, 5-, and 7-mer) migrate from an initial domain-connector pose toward a heme-proximal, previously characterized inhibitor-binding site, whereas the 14-mer remains kinetically confined to a peripheral surface site, implicating short-chain PE as a potential catalase inhibitor. In multichain corona systems, backbone dynamics show a non-monotonic, chain-length-dependent destabilization, with the 3- and 5-mer inducing the greatest structural perturbation and the 14-mer best preserving native-like dynamics despite forming an extensive, percolating surface network across all four subunits. MM-PBSA free energy decomposition identifies van der Waals interactions as the dominant thermodynamic driver of binding, while electrostatic surface mapping indicates that cationic surface patches instead govern long-range spatial targeting of PE chains. These findings establish a framework linking nanoplastic fragment size to protein-level toxicity, with direct implications for assessing the biochemical risk of environmentally weathered polyethylene.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 12 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement