Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A multi-tissue transcriptome strategy for genomic resource development in Pinus edulis

Created on 12 Oct 2026

Authors

Macias, D. S., Gyllenhaal, E. F., Kleinkopf, J. A., Pockman, W. T., Marx, H. E.

Abstract

Premise:: Conifers comprise one-sixth of global forests and landscape genomic studies are urgently needed to understand their biology, yet relatively few conifer species have reference genomes. Targeted exon-capture is a practical alternative to whole-genome sequencing, but selecting loci without a reference genome remains a barrier. We developed a multi-tissue reference transcriptome for pi non pine (Pinus edulis) to ask how multi-tissue sampling improves probe design, and what is lost under a conventional single-tissue approach. Methods: We assembled a reference transcriptome from four diploid tissues (needle, phloem, root, vegetative bud) and one haploid tissue (megagametophyte), using the latter as a pseudo-guide. We designed a target-capture probe-set by prioritizing highly expressed P. edulis transcripts and transcripts matching a conifer exon database. Results: We recovered 76% of conserved plant genes with few duplicated transcripts. Filtering yielded 15,664 transcripts totaling 31.4 Mb, ~0.1% of the genome. Tissue-specific expression was substantial: 27.4% of transcripts occurred exclusively in non-needle tissues. Functional annotation confirmed complementary contributions, including seed-desiccation and germination genes from megagametophytes, and defense- and stress-associated genes from roots and phloem. Discussion: We built a transcriptome and efficient probe set using a roadmap suitable for other non-model plants with large genomes; keys to success were prioritizing complementary tissues and using expression-based filtering.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 12 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement