Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

scGSCA: gene-set differential co-expression analysis for single-cell RNA sequencing data

Created on 13 Oct 2026

Authors

Jin, Z., Irlmeier, R., Ping, J., Wang, Y., Guo, Y., Ye, F.

Abstract

Understanding disease-associated pathway coordination requires distinguishing phenotype-related co-expression changes from differences across cellular contexts while accounting for cells sampled from the same subject. Bulk gene-set co-expression methods do not directly address the sparse counts, single-cell distributional noise, subject-level dependence, and cell-type heterogeneity of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. We developed single-cell gene-set co-expression analysis (scGSCA), a framework for pathway-level differential co-expression analysis in scRNA-seq data. scGSCA fits gene-wise zero-inflated negative binomial mixed models with subject-level random effects and computes gene-set co-expression statistics from quantile residual correlations. It provides an overall differential gene-set co-expression analysis and an interaction test to assess whether the co-expression pattern between two cell types varies by sample phenotype. We applied scGSCA to tumor-normal gastric, breast-subtype, and lung-skin comparisons with matched bulk and scRNA-seq data. The overall test identified signals not captured in bulk analysis, including Axon guidance in gastric cancer and estrogen-response, IL6-JAK-STAT3, and TNF/NF-{kappa}B pathways in breast cancer. The interaction test further identified co-expression contrasts across cell types. scGSCA extends gene-set co-expression analysis to single-cell data while retaining subject-level structure and cell-type-specific context. scGSCA is freely available as an open-source R package.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 13 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement