Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

An RFX-driven ciliogenic cell state defines ex vivo FGFR-inhibitor sensitivity in colorectal cancer

Created on 14 Oct 2026

Authors

Kralickova, L., Miglino, N., Esposito, C., Pfaendler, R., Wegmann, R., Ballesteros Cuartero, P., Mena, J., Panebianco, F., Boos, L. A., Richter, U., Rahimzadeh, P., Mehra, T., Koelzer, V. H., Piscuoglio, S., Wicki, A., Snijder, B.

Abstract

Genomic stratification leaves most patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) without opportunities for targeted therapy. Seeking tumour state-linked drug sensitivities, we combined image-based ex vivo drug profiling with matched transcriptomics in 127 prospectively collected patient biopsies across CRC stages and molecular subtypes. Network-level integration identified a ciliogenic cell state defined by upregulation of cilia related genes with selective sensitivity to the FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib. This ciliogenic signature was associated with poor progression-free survival (hazard ratio 2.28; adjusted p=0.0098), even in early-stage colorectal cancer. Furthermore, knockdown of the transcriptional regulators RFX2 and RFX3, upstream of the ciliogenic cell state, attenuated erdafitinib sensitivity. Orthogonal bulk and single-cell analyses across normal, primary and metastatic tissues contextualised the ciliogenic programme along a transition from canonical epithelial states towards fetal and non-canonical tumour states, concomitant with Wnt-related remodelling, FGFR1/FGFR2 upregulation, and loss of intestinal epithelial identity. Together, these findings define a tumour-intrinsic ciliogenic cell state as a feature of CRC progression, revealing a patient-stratified repurposing opportunity for targeted therapy beyond the current CRC treatment paradigms.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 14 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement