Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

NIK stabilization reprograms the pancreas toward chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic lipomatosis

Created on 16 Oct 2026

Authors

Du, Z., Weber, L., Buettner, U. F. G., Gerstenlauer, M., Manfras, U., Steiger, K., Metzler, T., Chan, L. K., Mulaw, M., Tsesmelis, M., Wirth, T.

Abstract

Pancreatic lipomatosis, characterized by progressive adipose replacement of the exocrine pancreas, is a known consequence of chronic pancreatitis. Despite its clinical relevance, the mechanisms driving lipomatosis remain poorly understood. Here, we used a pancreas-specific NF-{kappa}B-inducing kinase (NIK) stabilization mouse model to investigate how sustained non-canonical NF-{kappa}B signaling contributes to chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic lipomatosis. NIK stabilization initiated a rapid and fully penetrant pancreatic remodeling program, leading to acinar cell death already by the end of the first week of age. Deep learning on high-definition spatial transcriptomics revealed a progressive loss of acinar identity resulting in acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM) formation and identified GPA33 as a novel surface marker of ADMs. Over time, ADM lesions underwent apoptosis, leading to progressive loss of pancreatic parenchyma, organ atrophy, and extensive adipose replacement. Mechanistically, Relb deletion fully rescued the NIK-induced pancreatic phenotype, demonstrating that chronic pancreatitis and lipomatosis require RelB-dependent non-canonical NF-{kappa}B signaling in this model. Together, these findings define a RelB-dependent pathway linking sustained NIK stabilization to chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic lipomatosis. Our study provides a model for studying the development of pancreatic lipomatosis and for exploring potential therapeutic approaches.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 16 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement