Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A mosaic RBD-nanoparticle pan-sarbecovirus vaccine elicits nanobodies that target highly conserved epitopes

Created on 16 Oct 2026

Authors

Malecek, K. E., Keeffe, J. R., Fan, C., Alvarez, J., Player, A., Gao, H., Gnanapragasam, P. P. N. P., Rho, S., Schimanski, L., Segovia, L. N., Tan, T. K., Bjorkman, P. J.

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, continually mutates, producing new variants of concern (VOCs). Substitutions in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) have resulted in reduced efficacies of vaccines and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Indeed, since the emergence of Omicron and earlier VOCs, most previously approved anti-RBD therapeutic monoclonal antibodies are no longer authorized as therapeutics. To address VOC substitutions effects on therapeutic antibody efficacy, we sought to identify single-domain nanobodies (VHHs) targeting RBD regions (class 4, class 1/4, portions of class 3 and class 5 RBD epitopes) that are more conserved across VOCs, reasoning that the smaller size of camelid nanobodies compared with conventional two-domain antibody combining sites would facilitate access to occluded RBD epitopes. We used a Beacon optofluidic platform to isolate and characterize single memory B cells from a llama immunized with a mosaic RBD-nanoparticle immunogen that elicits broad antibody responses across sarbecoviruses. Using multiplex binding assays, we identified nanobodies that bind to spike RBDs from diverse sarbecovirus strains. Competition ELISAs and crystal structures of VHH-RBD complexes showed that isolated nanobodies recognize broadly conserved epitopes, including those on the RBD that are inaccessible to analogous conventional two-domain antibodies. Promising VHH-Fcs neutralized SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and zoonotic sarbecoviruses, demonstrating potential therapeutic utility for current and future outbreaks.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 16 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement