Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

LigRNA: High-accuracy prediction of RNA-ligand binding sites via dynamic chemical complementarity and language model encoding

Created on 18 Oct 2026

Authors

Wang, X., Zhu, H., Li, H., Chang, A., Zhang, F., Chen, H., Wang, C., Chen, K., Zhou, S. K., Xiong, P.

Abstract

RNA-binding small molecules represent a validated therapeutic modality, yet pinpointing their exact RNA binding sites remains critical for mechanistic understanding and drug optimization. Experimental methods, while precise, are costly and low-throughput, necessitating robust computational alternatives. Approaches based on static feature concatenation may overlook input-dependent relationships between RNA residues and ligand functional groups. Here we present LigRNA, a graph neural network framework that predicts RNA-ligand binding sites through joint cross-modal encoding of both molecules. LigRNA integrates structure-guided language model embeddings with physicochemical features-solvent-accessible surface area and secondary structure types, to construct comprehensive RNA representations. Ligands are encoded as attributed molecular graphs via graph attention networks, preserving atom-level chemical topology rather than compressing molecules into fixed fingerprints. A cross-attention mechanism then enables dynamic, ligand-dependent modulation of RNA nucleotide attention, capturing context-specific interaction patterns. Benchmarked on TE9 and TE18 datasets, LigRNA achieves F1 scores of 0.73 and 0.58, improving on GATRsite by 7.4% and 18.4%, respectively. Ablation studies identify the RNA residual encoder as the most consistent contributor across the two benchmarks. The source code is freely available at https://github.com/WillowWang0216/LigRNA.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 18 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement