SubcellPert: Benchmarking Subcellular Perturbation Prediction

Authors

Wang, J., Cao, H., Dang, X., Zhou, T., Zhao, Y., Hsieh, C.-Y., Gu, C., Heng, P. A.

Abstract

Perturbations change both RNA abundance and intracellular organization, but gene-count predictors omit the positions needed to model spatial responses. To address this limitation, we introduce textbf{textit{SubcellPert}}, a benchmark for perturbation-response prediction at single-RNA-molecule resolution. It comprises 14 imaging datasets with 13.88 million cells and 3.65 billion RNA molecules. Given source observations and a directed condition change, models generate target RNA populations in normalized two-dimensional coordinates. Two independently trained tasks separate abundance from localization: textit{Oracle} predicts coordinates given exact target counts; textit{Joint} predicts both. Eight baselines span source resampling, classical transport, and frozen foundation-model adapters. Fixed perturbation and cellular-context holdouts evaluate abundance error, target-gene coverage, and conditional spatial error. Through within-dataset analyses, we find context-dependent gains from spatial features in condition decoding. Interpreting spatial responses requires distinguishing changes within spatial clusters from population composition, and RNA fractions from enrichment relative to compartment geometry. Through comprehensive experiments, we find that Gaussian transport achieves the lowest Oracle spatial error on eight of eleven cellular-context OOD datasets. Audits show that better centroid accuracy can accompany worse radial distributions, and that 19 of 190 Joint adapter fits retain source counts after validation. SubcellPert opens a spatial frontier for virtual cell research, laying the groundwork for predictive models that capture both the molecular composition and intracellular organization of cellular responses. The code is available at url{https://github.com/king159/SubcellPert}.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 18 Oct 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.