Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

X-SPEAR: An Extensible Framework for Spatial Panel Evaluation and Refinement

Created on 21 Oct 2026

Authors

Patel, R., Duong, B., Patel, V., Maurer, J., Rice, G., Cheng, Y.

Abstract

Targeted spatial transcriptomics platforms such as Xenium require a predefined gene panel, and the genes in that panel are detected less efficiently, and to gene-specific degrees, in the spatial assay than in the single-cell reference used to choose them. We present X-SPEAR, a framework that couples DART marker selection with probe-level off-target assessment. DART learns short, interpretable Boolean gene rules and assembles several gene-disjoint rules per cell type. Its detection-aware training thins the reference to per-gene detection rates measured in a different, already completed experiment, so no Xenium data from the target tissue are needed before the panel is ordered. On held-out Xenium data from ovarian cancer, mouse brain and cervical cancer, DART substantially outperformed existing marker-selection methods at matched panel size, by 0.04-0.11 macro-F1 over Wilcoxon rank-sum, 0.04-0.08 over COSG and 0.10-0.18 over NS-Forest, and it reached Wilcoxon's best accuracy with 42-69% fewer genes. Ablations show that most of this gain comes from detection-aware training, which also improves other rank-based selectors and requires a detection profile measured with the same assay chemistry. At similar accuracy, DART's rule structure adds rules that faithfully summarise the downstream classifier, robustness to single-probe loss across 45 retinal ganglion cell subtypes, and better resolution of closely related cell states. We are applying X-SPEAR to design a Xenium panel for mouse retinal ganglion cell subtypes, and its in situ evaluation is in progress. X-SPEAR is available as an open-source Python package.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 21 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement