Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparative study on chromatic acclimation in the two Synechococcus species WH8109 and RS9916

Created on 23 Oct 2026

Authors

Solanki, J., Fernandez, M., Pawitsch, M., Gehringer, M. M., Zehner, S., Frankenberg-Dinkel, N.

Abstract

Marine Synechococcus cyanobacteria can modify their light-harvesting phycobilisome antennae in response to spectral changes through chromatic acclimation (CA). CA type IV (CA4) involves adjustment of the ratio of the blue-absorbing phycourobilin (PUB) to the green-absorbing phycoerythrobilin (PEB). Although CA4 is associated with a genomic island occurring in two configurations (CA4-A and CA4-B), some strains carrying this island, including Synechococcus sp. WH8109, have been reported to lack CA4 activity. Here, we investigated whether WH8109 undergoes CA4 under blue light (BL) and green light (GL) conditions, using the CA4-positive strain RS9916 as a reference. Whole-cell fluorescence, flow cytometry, isolated phycobilisome analysis, and sequencing of the CA4-B genomic island were used to assess pigment acclimation and identify potential genetic differences. WH8109 showed a stable PUB:PEB ratio of approximately 0.71 under BL and GL, with no detectable changes in PUB content or phycobilisome chromophore composition. In contrast, RS9916 exhibited clear CA4, with PUB:PEB ratios of 1.57 under BL and 0.72 under GL. Sequencing revealed no insertions, deletions, or other sequence anomalies in the WH8109 CA4-B genomic island compared to the public sequence. These results demonstrate that WH8109 does not undergo detectable CA4 under the conditions tested, despite possessing an intact CA4-B genomic island, highlighting a genotype-phenotype discrepancy that warrants further investigation.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 23 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement