Shared and distinct immunometabolic states link to divergent pathology in cutaneous mycobacterial infections

Authors

Guo, H., Zeng, R., Wei, Q., Xiong, J., Jiang, H., Shi, Y., Zhang, W., Pan, C., Cheng, C., Wang, H., Wang, Y.

Abstract

Cutaneous mycobacterial infections provide a common tissue setting in which related intracellular pathogens elicit distinct pathological responses, but the innate immune basis of this divergence remains incompletely understood. Here, we combined single-cell profiling from 33 individuals with histological and functional analyses, examining healthy skin and lesions from multibacillary leprosy (MB), paucibacillary leprosy (PB), cutaneous tuberculosis (CTB) and Mycobacterium marinum infection (Mari). All infections showed lower mononuclear phagocyte and higher natural killer (NK) cell proportions within the CD45 compartment, alongside shared and infection-associated dendritic cell, macrophage and NK cell programs. CTB and Mari displayed broader macrophage antimicrobial signatures, whereas MB showed lipid-associated programs and attenuated interferon-associated effector expression across multiple macrophage subsets. Reduced expression of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1 (FBP1) was associated with the absence of Langhans giant cells in MB, and pharmacological FBP1 inhibition nearly abolished fusion of macrophages. Compared with NK cells from Mari, MB NK cells showed reduced central carbon and oxidative metabolism signatures alongside increased lipid-associated programs. Functional experiments showed that inhibition of glucose utilization, disruption of mitochondrial function, or co-culture with foamy macrophages abundant in MB lesions reduced NK cell IFN-{gamma} production. These findings identify shared and distinct innate immune programs and suggest that their interplay with local metabolic environments shapes divergent pathology across cutaneous mycobacterial infections.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 24 Oct 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.