Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Once in a blue moon: an unexpected evolutionary route to blue floral pigmentation in orchids

Created on 24 Oct 2026

Authors

John, E., O'Donnell, R., Perkins, J., Ruibal, M., Mizuno, T., Peakall, R., Wong, D.

Abstract

Blue flowers are rare in the hyperdiverse orchid family, and the genetic mechanisms enabling their blue delphinidin-based pigmentation remain poorly understood. Within the Australian orchid subtribe Caladeniinae (~350 spp.), repeated transitions from maroon to blue flowers, followed by reversions to maroon, provide a unique opportunity to investigate blue flower evolution. Using phylotranscriptomics, anthocyanin profiling, molecular evolutionary analyses, and gene expression data from 51 species, we reconstructed the genetic changes associated with these transitions. Despite its near-universal role in delphinidin biosynthesis across flowering plants, unexpectedly, we found no evidence for a functional CYP75A-mediated flavonoid 3'5'-hydroxylase (F3'5'H) pathway. Instead, blue-flowered species possess a duplicated CYP75B lineage gene (CYP75B-D) with apparent 5'-hydroxylase activity, a derived D-type dihydroflavonol reductase (DFR), and a distinct anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway co-expression pattern. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that the D-type DFR pre-dated blue flower evolution, representing a permissive evolutionary shift later coupled with the evolution of CYP75B-D. Notably, blue flower evolution coincided with repeated pollinator transitions and major palaeoenvironmental change during the Middle Miocene. Together, these findings reveal an unexpected route to blue floral pigmentation and suggest that its evolution arose through the interaction of molecular innovation, regulatory evolution, and ecological opportunity.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 24 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement