Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Multi-scale histology reveals localized ageing signatures in normal human colon

Created on 25 Oct 2026

Authors

Altshuler, G., Teper, C., Barak, Y., Aviel-Ronen, S., Loebel, A., Barshack, I.

Abstract

Ageing is accompanied by heterogeneous changes in tissue structure, cellular composition, and microenvironments, yet how these changes are reflected in routine human histology remains poorly understood. Here, we introduce a histology-first, multi-scale digital pathology framework to study human colon ageing using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole-slide images from clinically normal colon biopsies. The framework combines pathology foundation-model patch embeddings, attention-based multiple-instance learning, cell-level morphometric profiling, and prototype-based tissue compartmentalization. We show that chronological age can be predicted from normal colon tissue using mesoscopic representations derived from pathology foundation-model patch embeddings and attention-based multiple-instance learning. Incorporating cell-type-level morphometric features further improves prediction and refines the spatial allocation of model attention. By integrating attention maps with prototype-defined tissue compartments, we identify localized age-associated differences within stromal, epithelial, and lymphoid mucosal niches. Finally, we show that prediction discordant cases exhibit cellular profiles shifted toward the model-assigned age group, suggesting that some apparent model errors may reflect tissue-level age discordance beyond chronological age. Together, these findings show that routine H&E histology captures spatially localized signatures of normal human colon ageing and provides a scalable framework for linking tissue morphology with biological ageing state.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 25 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement