Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Sequence-only antigen context improves modeling of antibody hypervariable regions

Created on 25 Oct 2026

Authors

Ashraf, F. B., Lonardi, S.

Abstract

The complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of antibodies govern antigen specificity; consequently, CDR design should be performed conditional on the target antigen. Most published approaches depend on the availability of the antigen's three-dimensional (3D) structure, which is often difficult to obtain experimentally. In contrast, sequence-only models circumvent this requirement but are typically trained on antibodies without incorporating antigen context; exposure to antigen sequences alone does not necessarily entail learning the underlying interaction determinants. Here, we introduce LangAAI, a masked language model that conditions exclusively on antibody and antigen primary sequences and therefore does not require 3D structures, docking poses, or epitope annotations. To assess whether the model exhibits genuine antigen conditioning, we replace the cognate antigen with a non-binding decoy. Whereas antigen-agnostic models are largely insensitive to this substitution, LangAAI shows a marked reduction in sequence recovery that is specifically concentrated in the hypervariable CDR3 loop. Across benchmarks, LangAAI improves amino-acid recovery relative to existing antibody language models, matches the performance of structure-based methods when evaluated under their respective protocols, and ranks experimentally measured variants by affinity comparably to inverse-folding models that use backbone coordinates. Collectively, these results support LangAAI as a structure-independent approach for antigen-aware antibody optimization, enabling prioritization of candidate variants for targets lacking solved antigen-antibody complexes.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 25 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 15
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement