Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Auto-AVS: A Novel Framework for Automated Autophagic Vacuole Simulation

Created on 27 Oct 2026

Authors

Bleta, S., Dunning, P., Ross, A., Backues, S. K., Spantidi, O.

Abstract

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is widely used to quantify autophagic bodies in yeast, but ultra-thin sectioning provides only two-dimensional cross-sections of inherently 3D structures. Inferring the underlying size and number of autophagic bodies therefore requires assumptions about their geometry, spatial organization, and distribution within the vacuole. We introduce Auto-AVS, an open-source computational stereology framework that combines configurable 3D autophagic-vacuole simulation, optional CompuCell3D-based body deformation, virtual TEM sectioning, and statistical comparison with experimental data. We first validate the virtual sectioning pipeline against analytical stereology and an existing spherical R-based simulation. We then use Auto-AVS to examine whether explicitly modeling autophagic-body deformation alters observed section statistics and find no consistent measurable effect under the tested simulation parameters. Finally, we apply the framework to experimental wild-type and mutant TEM datasets. Auto-AVS produces body-size estimates closely consistent with conventional stereological estimates, while body-number fitting reveals substantial discrepancies between simulated and experimental distributions despite similar average count estimates. These discrepancies implicate spatial clustering and vacuole geometry as important limitations of current body-number models. Rather than replacing conventional stereology, Auto-AVS provides a computational framework for testing its underlying assumptions and determining which aspects of 3D organization affect inference from two-dimensional microscopy.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 27 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 17
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement