Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Phylogenetic position and expanded host range of the photosymbiont Brandtodinium nutricula (Peridiniales, Dinophyceae)

Created on 29 Oct 2026

Authors

Coots, N. L., Blanco Bercial, L., Gile, G. H., Keeling, P. J.

Abstract

Brandtodinium nutricula is a dinoflagellate species commonly reported in symbiosis with the marine protist host lineage, Collodaria (Rhizaria). Despite the widespread abundance of this symbiosis throughout the open ocean, and clear indications that the alga should be capable of existing outside of the symbiosis, there are no reports to date of the alga in free-living form in the environment. Even though B. nutricula molecular data are publicly available, the phylogenetic position of B. nutricula remains unclear. Our taxon-rich 18S rRNA gene phylogenetic analysis revealed a close association between B. nutricula and the copepod parasite lineage, Blastodinium. We next analyzed Tara Oceans metabarcode data to assess B. nutricula abundance outside of the Collodaria symbiosis and found that B. nutricula is common in free-living form throughout the sunlit ocean. Similarly, B. nutricula does not significantly correlate with Collodaria in terms of read depth in Tara Oceans samples, despite their tight association. We also determined that B. nutricula can live symbiotically within planktonic Foraminifera using fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy in combination with fluorescence in situ hybridization. These findings indicate that the radiolarian-B. nutricula symbiosis is less specific than previously suggested, highlighting the complexity of open ocean symbioses and the importance of weighing both host and symbiont perspectives when considering who benefits from the relationship.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 29 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement