Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Agentic cryo-EM structure determination with CryoPilot

Created on 31 Oct 2026

Authors

Punuru, P., Klose, T., Kihara, D.

Abstract

Single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo EM) relies on mature computational tools, but experts must still inspect intermediate results, choose among alternative processing routes, and decide when earlier choices should be revised. Here we present CryoPilot, a system of two language model agents that carries cryo-EM data from raw micrographs through three-dimensional reconstruction to validated atomic models. Rather than executing a predefined pipeline, its reconstruction agent evaluates intermediate images and quantitative diagnostics, selects and parameterizes CryoSPARC jobs, tests alternative strategies, compares their outcomes, and retains, revises, or reverts decisions accordingly. A persistent programming environment and session database preserve the complete processing history, making each decision traceable and allowing multi day workflows to proceed with minimal human intervention. Its modeling agent determines map handedness, builds atomic models with CryoZeta, removes regions the density does not support, and optimizes each model by testing refinement steps against map fit, geometry, and DAQ, a measure of local model to map agreement. Across nine public EMPIAR datasets, eight reconstructions reached 2.61 to 3.51 A resolution, and refined models from seven maps agreed with reference structures to within 0.4 to 4.9 A Calpha; RMSD. For a challenging alpha latrocrustotoxin dataset, a single change of particle picking strategy that we suggested enabled CryoPilot to improve the reconstruction from 5.9 to 4.15 A. CryoPilot establishes an adaptive and auditable framework for agent-driven cryo-EM structure determination.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 31 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement