Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

EMBER: Contextualized gene representations enable compositional prediction across cellular perturbations

Created on 01 Nov 2026

Authors

Ho, N., Xing, E. P., Ma, J.

Abstract

Predicting the effects of individual and combined perturbations is central to identifying context-specific vulnerabilities and designing targeted interventions. Yet learning gene representations that integrate functional relationships with cellular state and transfer across perturbation tasks remains challenging. Here, we present EMBER, a gene-centric foundation model that learns context-dependent functional representations of genes. EMBER combines interaction-guided contrastive learning with masked expression reconstruction during pretraining on a single-cell corpus curated for diversity and balanced sampling across cell types and experimental batches. EMBER decouples gene representation learning from task-specific prediction through a composable embedding framework: the pretrained encoder remains frozen, while lightweight probes combine contextualized gene embeddings to predict individual and combined perturbation effects. The same pretrained representations support single-gene perturbation-response prediction, digenic interaction prediction, and multi-target drug-response prediction. EMBER improves cross-context perturbation-response prediction and genetic-interaction ranking relative to evaluated baselines. EMBER also prioritized SCFD1, a mediator of autophagosome-lysosome fusion, as a candidate dependency during mTOR inhibition. Together, these results establish contextualized gene embeddings as reusable building blocks for modeling genetic and pharmacological perturbations, supporting the prioritization of genetic interactions and context-specific interventions for experimental testing.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 01 Nov 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement