Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

HLAResolver: A statistical framework for resolving HLA ambiguity in T-cell response data

Created on 04 Nov 2026

Authors

Al-Asadi, H., Noakes, M. T., Klinger, M., Howie, B., Robins, H.

Abstract

Large-scale models of T-cell recognition require training examples that specify the complete T-cell receptor (TCR)-peptide-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex. Multiplexed Identification of T-cell Receptor Antigen Specificity (MIRA) is a high-throughput assay that identifies TCRs associated with responses to specific peptides, but does not determine which HLA presents each peptide. Because a donor can carry up to six distinct class I HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C alleles, each response may have several candidate presenting HLAs. To narrow this set of candidate presenting HLAs, we developed HLAResolver, a statistical framework that combines MIRA response patterns across HLA-typed donors with NetMHCpan predictions of peptide presentation. For each peptide, HLAResolver uses negative-binomial regression to jointly estimate associations between HLA alleles and TCR response counts, accounting for differences in assay yield. NetMHCpan eluted-ligand predictions guide sparse regularization, favoring alleles with stronger predicted presentation while allowing strong MIRA response evidence to support alternatives. To assess whether this integration provides an advantage over either approach alone, we compared HLAResolver with NetMHCpan, which predicts peptide-HLA presentation, and the Restrictor Analysis Tool for Epitopes (RATE), which infers HLA associations from T-cell response patterns. Using held-out MIRA experiments, we assessed each method's ability to predict observed responses and the number of candidate HLAs it assigned. At matched specificity for predicting MIRA responses, HLAResolver achieved higher sensitivity while selecting fewer candidate HLAs per peptide than either comparator.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 04 Nov 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement