Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

High-density environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals fine-scale three-dimensional structure of a fish community in a semi-closed bay

Created on 05 Nov 2026

Authors

Murakami, H., Nakadai, R., Jo, T. S., Wu, Q., Kadotani Tomojiri, D., Masuda, R.

Abstract

Coastal fish assemblages are influenced by environmental heterogeneity across horizontal and vertical dimensions, yet their fine-scale three-dimensional structure remains poorly understood. We investigated spatial variation in fish assemblages using environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding at 100 stations across three depth layers (300 samples) in Maizuru Bay, a semi-enclosed coastal bay in Japan. Concurrent hydrographic measurements were used to examine associations between fish assemblage composition and environmental conditions. We detected 216 fish species, with mean species richness decreasing from 28.4 at the surface to 16.4 at the bottom. Thirty-three species were detected exclusively below the surface. Fish assemblage composition differed significantly among depth layers and exhibited pronounced horizontal turnover along the bay axis. Although depth, geographic position, and measured environmental variables were associated with assemblage composition, they collectively explained only 13.0% of the variation. The independent contribution of spatial position (2.9%) exceeded those of depth (0.8%) and measured environmental variables (0.9%). These findings demonstrate substantial three-dimensional heterogeneity in coastal fish assemblages that cannot be fully explained by conventional hydrographic measurements. Our study highlights the importance of integrating horizontal and vertical sampling to characterize coastal fish biodiversity and improve marine ecosystem monitoring.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 05 Nov 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement