Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

SeekNSee: A Rule-Based Framework for Prioritizing Proteotypic Peptides

Created on 10 Nov 2026

Authors

Camacho, M. F., Lanfredi, G. P., Paes Leme, A., Coimbra, N. A. d. R., Miyamoto, J. G.

Abstract

Selecting peptides candidates for target proteomics requires integrating a multicriteria problem, particularly when users lack prior experimental data, programming expertise, or stable access to external repositories. We development SeekNSee, a locally executed R/Shiny application designed to improve the reproducibility and auditability of peptide-candidate screening through enzyme-aware in silico digestion, configurable and traceable rule-level decision tracking. Starting from a user provided reference proteome and target sequences, SeekNSee generates peptides-candidates using nine digestion configurations and evaluates them with 12 rules configured as ignore, apply, or block. Numerical score and retained/blocking status are stored independently, and every candidate-rule outcome is preserved in a rule-level trace. Computational validation confirmed the specified behavior in controlled cases through 198 passing automated assertions, complemented by successful operational and processing tests on Windows and Ubuntu. Proteome-wide application covered all 20,416 reviewed human proteins, generating 733,864 peptide-candidate and 581,026 unique peptides sequences while preserving data integrity, decision traceability, and candidate-specific context. DIA, DDA, and deep-fractionated proteomics benchmarking showed strong associations between SeekNSee scores categories, peptide observation, and multiple analytical measurements. Together, these results support that SeekNSee provides a transparent and traceable screening layer for generating peptide-candidates for subsequent assay and experimental validation.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 10 Nov 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement