Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

EVOSYNTH: Enabling Multi-Target Drug Discovery through Latent Evolutionary Optimization and Synthesis-Aware Prioritization

Created on 06 Nov 2025

Authors

Nguyen, V. T. D., Pham, P., Hy, T.-S.

Abstract

Complex diseases, such as cancer and neurodegeneration, feature interconnected pathways, making single-target therapies ineffective due to pathway redundancy and compensatory mechanisms. Polypharmacy, which combines multiple drugs to target distinct proteins, addresses this but often leads to drug-drug interactions, cumulative toxicity, and complex pharmacokinetics. To overcome these challenges, we introduce EVOSYNTH, a modular framework for multi-target drug discovery that combines latent evolution and synthesis-aware prioritization to generate and prioritize candidates with high translational potential. Latent evolution navigates a chemically and functionally informed latent space to identify candidates with strong predicted affinity across multiple targets. Synthesis-aware prioritization evaluates both retrosynthetic feasibility and the trade-off between synthetic cost and therapeutic reward, enabling practical and efficient candidate selection. Applied to dual inhibition of JNK3 and GSK3-beta in Alzheimer's disease and PI3K and PARP1 in ovarian cancer, EVOSYNTH consistently outperforms baseline generative models, achieving higher predicted affinities, improved scaffold diversity, and lower synthesis costs. These findings highlight EVOSYNTH's ability to integrate target-driven generation with practical synthesizability, establishing a scalable framework for multi-target and polypharmacological drug discovery. Our source code and data to reproduce all experiments is publicly available on GitHub at: https://github.com/HySonLab/EvoSynth

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 06 Nov 2025.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 35
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement