Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Proton stress adaptation in acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria: insights from Acididesulfobacillus acetoxydans for acid mine drainage bioremediation

Created on 07 Nov 2025

Authors

Egas, R. A., Bale, N. J., Koenen, M., Villanueva, L., Sousa, D. Z., Welte, C. U., Sanchez-Andrea, I.

Abstract

Acid mine drainage (AMD) waters are a global environmental threat due to their extremely low pH (< 3) and high metal loads. Acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria (aSRB) can mitigate AMD by reducing sulfate to sulfide, a proton-consuming process that also precipitates metals as metal sulfides. Although sulfate reduction has been observed in AMD waters, most characterized aSRB are only moderately acidophilic and originate from protected microniches. Here, we examined the pH tolerance and proton stress adaptation of the complete organic acid-oxidizing aSRB Acididesulfobacillus acetoxydans. Continuous chemostat cultivations were operated across a pH gradient, achieving steady states from pH 5.0 (optimum) down to 2.9, with microcosms showing metabolic activity even at pH 2.5 which is typical AMD-acidity. Transcriptomic profiles remained remarkably stable across conditions, except for upregulation of the K+-transporting ATPase (kdpABC) at lower pH, suggesting an increased reliance on the chemiosmotic gradient to impede proton influx. Lipid analysis revealed increased core lipid saturation, mid-chain methylation and a shift in priming precursors from leucine to valine at low pH, indicating reduced membrane permeability and more energy-efficient biosynthetic pathways. These adaptations impede proton entry demonstrating adaptation of aSRB to AMD-like acidity and removes the critical pH bottleneck for AMD bioremediation and metal recovery.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 07 Nov 2025.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 39
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement