Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Iron addicted colorectal cancers exploit Heme-Complex II axis to resist oxidative cell death

Created on 08 Nov 2025

Authors

Jain, C., Essani, M., Kumar, R., Das, N. k., Singhal, R., Rossiter, N. J., Chen, B., Huang, W., Lee, Z. H., Solanki, S., Zhang, Y., Sajjakulnukit, P., Zhang, L., Dalal, P. J., Hanna, D. A., McCollum, S., Stoffel, E. M., Greenson, J. K., Maher, L. J., Lyssiotis, C. A., Banerjee, R., Shah, Y. M.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) cells are addicted to iron, which fuels nucleotide synthesis, mitochondrial respiration, and rapid proliferation. Yet paradoxically, high intracellular iron is cytotoxic to most other cells, raising the question of how CRC cells tolerate and exploit iron-rich environments. One pathway thought to mediate iron toxicity is ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of cell death. However, most ferroptosis regulators were identified through synthetic chemical screens or small molecule activators, and it remains unclear whether these canonical pathways explain how iron itself triggers cell death, particularly in vivo. Here, using multi-omics profiling, CRISPR screening, and in vivo models, we uncover a heme succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) Coenzyme Q (CoQ) axis that enables CRC cells to buffer iron-induced oxidative stress. Heme-dependent SDH reduces CoQ, which redistributes to mitochondrial and plasma membranes to detoxify lipid ROS as a radical trapping antioxidant. This pathway functions alongside, and in some contexts independently of, canonical ferroptosis regulators. These findings reveal that CRCs co-opt metabolic cofactors not only for growth but also for survival under physiologically toxic iron levels, uncovering new vulnerabilities for therapy.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 08 Nov 2025.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 41
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement