Authors
Aguirre-Sourrouille, Z., Hackl, T., Oksanen, H. M., Quax, T. E. F.
Abstract
The ongoing evolutionary arm race between archaea and their viruses has led to the development of diverse defense systems against viruses. While recent computational approaches have uncovered many bacterial antiviral defense systems, the viral infection strategies and antiviral responses of archaea remain poorly explored. In this study, we identified antiviral defense systems encoded in the genomes of 20 recently sequenced haloarchaeal strains. These systems are representative of the broader repertoire of defense systems present across all 253 complete sequenced Halobacteria (class) genomes in the RefSeq database. Detailed analysis showed that these haloarchaea usually harbor multiple different defense systems, with a particularly high abundance of uncharacterized predicted defense systems against viruses (Phage Defense Candidates (PDCs)). To further explore the impact of anti-viral defense mechanisms on host range, an extensive virus-host pair screening was performed using a panel of known virulent viruses. By correlating the genomic defense profiles with observed viral infectivity and adsorption profiles, a weak correlation between the number of encoded defense systems and viral susceptibility was detected. Specifically, hosts infected by fewer viruses tended to encode a broader repertoire of antiviral defense systems, whereas those with fewer defense systems were frequently infected. It was found that the host range of haloarchaeal viruses is majorly determined by the availability of viral receptors, whereas the presence of anti-viral defense systems plays a smaller but significant role. These findings offer valuable insights into the evolutionary pressure shaping archaeal antiviral strategies and lay the groundwork for future functional studies of archaeal defense systems.
Preprint server:
bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 09 Nov 2025.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 38
- Comments 0