Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Effect of PAPE Induced by Different Squat Loads on Jump Performance in Collegiate Female Basketball Players

Created on 11 Nov 2025

Authors

Si, X., Liu, Y. H., Zhou, X. R., Ning, S. J., Li, Q. B.

Abstract

Background: Post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) can acutely augment explosive performance, yet the optimal prescription of squat load and recovery for female basketball players remains unclear. Methods: Twenty-eight collegiate womens basketball athletes were randomly allocated to 90%, 80%, or 70% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) back-squat groups, or a control group. Athletes completed 3x3 parallel back squats, after which countermovement jump (CMJ), single-leg and double-leg approach-jump heights were assessed at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 min. CMJ kinetics--peak power output, vertical ground-reaction force, and flight time--and lower-limb surface EMG were recorded concurrently. Results: Loads [≥]80%1RM reliably elicited PAPE, with improvements demonstrating clear load-dependence and time specificity. Double-leg approach-jump height peaked at 8 min in the 90%1RM group (40.50 {+/-} 1.73 cm). Single-leg approach-jump height was maximized at 8 min in the 80%1RM group (40.00 {+/-} 0.82 cm), exceeding the control condition. Kinetic and EMG analyses indicated that 90%1RM produced a delayed rectus femoris activation peak (8 min) and a later CMJ power peak (12 min), whereas 80%1RM facilitated earlier gastrocnemius activation (4 min) with a stable output profile; performance benefits with 70%1RM were minimal. Conclusions: A moderately high load (80%1RM) paired with an 8-12-min recovery window strikes a favorable balance between neural potentiation and fatigue, offering a practical pre-competition activation strategy to enhance anaerobic power and jump performance in female basketball players.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 11 Nov 2025.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 46
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement