Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Indication model for laparoscopic repeat liver resection in the era of artificial intelligence: machine learning prediction of surgical indication.

Created on 17 Mar 2025

Authors

Sung Jun Jo, Jinsoo Rhu, Jongman Kim, Gyu-Seong Choi, Jae-Won Joh

Published in

HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association. Mar 04, 2025. Epub Mar 04, 2025.

Abstract

Laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LRLR) is still a challenging technique and requires a careful selection of indications. However, the current difficulty scoring system is not suitable for selecting indications. The purpose of this study is to develop the indication model for LRLR using machine learning and to identify factors associated with open conversion (OC).
Patients who underwent repeat hepatectomy (2017-2021) at Samsung Medical Center 2021 were investigated. Multiple indication models were developed using machine learning techniques (random forest, SVM, XGB) and logistic regression. The predictive performance of these models was compared, and risk factors associated with OC were analyzed.
Among 221 patients (110 LRLR, 111 ORLR), the ORLR group had a higher previous open approach rate (75.7% vs. 38.2%, p<0.001). Twice previous abdominal surgery was the only independent OC risk factor (OR 6.56, p=0.009). The indication model showed moderate predictive power (random forest AUC=0.779, logistic regression AUC=0.725, p=0.710). Important variables were previous laparoscopic approach, present subsegmentectomy, and left-sided tumor location.
The performance of the indication model for LRLR showed moderate predictive power in both machine learning and logistic regression. The important variables for LRLR were previous laparoscopic approach, present subsegmentectomy, and left side location.

PMID:
40090778
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Mar 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 45
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement