Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Subclinical B-type Natriuretic Peptide Elevation 24 Months After Anthracycline-Containing Chemotherapy.

Created on 17 Mar 2025

Authors

Tetsuya Tani, Masayoshi Oikawa, Himika Ohara, Daiki Yaegashi, Yu Sato, Tetsuro Yokokawa, Shunsuke Miura, Tomofumi Misaka, Akiomi Yoshihisa, Takafumi Ishida, Yasuchika Takeishi

Published in

International heart journal. Mar 15, 2025. Epub Mar 15, 2025.

Abstract

The incidence of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity typically occurs within the first year after chemotherapy, but the changes in cardiac function and biomarkers beyond this initial year have not been adequately investigated. We analyzed 105 consecutive patients followed for 24 months after anthracycline-containing chemotherapy at Fukushima Medical University Hospital from June 2018 to April 2021. Echocardiography and blood tests for cardiac troponin I and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) were conducted at baseline, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after chemotherapy initiation. In the whole patient cohort, BNP levels increased from 10.5 [6.3-18.3] pg/mL at baseline to 19.2 [12.1-34.5] pg/mL at 24 months after chemotherapy (P < 0.01). Based on BNP levels at 24 months, the patients were divided into 2 groups: a BNP-elevated group (n = 57) and a BNP-normal group (n = 48). In the BNP-elevated group, time-course changes revealed that BNP levels remained stable until 12 months, but increased at 24 months. Multivariate logistic analysis identified age, total anthracycline dose, and baseline BNP levels as predicting factors for elevated BNP levels at 24 months. Subclinical BNP elevation was observed at 24 months of follow-up after initiation of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.

PMID:
40090710
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Mar 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 65
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement