Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Gas adsorption analysis of pore structure differences and influencing factors in coal with varying metamorphic grades.

Created on 07 Apr 2025

Authors

Cuixia Wang, Bohao Zhang, Jingdan Qiao, Lanhua Zhao, Dongliang Xu, Jikun Liu

Published in

Scientific reports. Volume 15. Issue 1. Pages 11793. Apr 06, 2025. Epub Apr 06, 2025.

Abstract

The heterogeneity structural characteristics of the pores in the coal matrix largely determine the storage and transport capacity of gas. In order to quantitatively characterize the pore structure in coal matrix and analyze the influencing factors, the filled pores (0.38-1.5 nm) and diffusion pores (1.5-100 nm) of seven coal samples with different metamorphic degrees were measured by low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption and carbon dioxide adsorption experiments, and combined with the theory of multifractality, the filled pores and adsorbed pores of coal samples with different degrees of metamorphism were characterized and discussed. The multiple fractal characteristics and influencing factors of the filled and adsorbed pores of coal samples with different metamorphic degrees were characterized and discussed. The results show that both diffusion pores and filled pores have multiple fractal characteristics; the more metamorphism, the more developed the filled pores and the stronger the heterogeneity. High-order coals had a strong heterogeneity of diffusion pores, while low-order coals exhibited a strong heterogeneity of filled pores. The heterogeneity of filled pores was negatively correlated with specific surface area and pore volume, while the opposite was true for diffusion pores. The relationship between pore heterogeneity and fixed carbon content showed a "U" distribution.

PMID:
40189605
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Apr 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 17
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement