Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Consistency evaluation of nursing interns and nurses using the ICF-RS for rehabilitation assessment.

Created on 16 Apr 2025

Authors

Shufen Pan, Yan Han, Jinling Zhu, Yingna Li, Bing Guo, Caiyan Lan, Danni Li, Cuiying Tang, Dongxu Si, Shuyun Xiong

Published in

BMC nursing. Volume 24. Issue 1. Pages 427. Apr 15, 2025. Epub Apr 15, 2025.

Abstract

This study sought to evaluate the consistency of functional level assessments conducted by nursing interns and an experienced nurse in elderly patients, using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Rehabilitation Set (ICF-RS).
Forty-one elderly residents from a care facility in Guangzhou were included in this study. Functional evaluations were performed using the ICF-RS by six nursing interns and one experienced nurse. The consistency of assessments between the nursing interns, as well as between the interns and the experienced nurse, was measured using Kendall and Kappa coefficients.
Consistency among the nursing interns was good, with Kendall coefficients greater than 0.6 for most categories, except for sexual function. However, the consistency between the nursing interns and the experienced nurse was lower in categories such as energy and drive functions (b130), sleep functions (b134), emotional functions (b152), pain sensation (b280), sexual functions (b640), and urination functions (b620), where Kappa coefficients were below 0.3. For other categories, consistency was deemed acceptable (Kappa > 0.3).
There is a need to enhance the training of nursing interns to ensure they can effectively utilize the ICF-RS assessment tool.
Not applicable.

PMID:
40234879
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Apr 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement