Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Selective Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Placental Anastomoses Leads to Early Reduction of Cardiovascular Burden in the Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome.

Created on 27 Apr 2025

Authors

Kasey J Chaszczewski, Sarah Perelman, Christine B Falkensammer, Anita Szwast, Chengcheng Pang, Zhiyun Tian, Juliana Gebb, Julie Moldenhauer, Nahla Khalek, Jack Rychik

Published in

Prenatal diagnosis. Apr 26, 2025. Epub Apr 26, 2025.

Abstract

Cardiovascular disturbances are common in twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). However, the rate of improvement in cardiovascular burden in response to selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (SFLP) is not well known.
Fetal echocardiograms were performed prior to and 1 week following SFLP. Cardiovascular burden was characterized using the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) TTTS Cardiovascular (CV) Score. Pulsatility indices (PI) of the umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA), cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and elements of CHOP CV Score were analyzed pre and post SFLP.
SFLP was performed in 198 subjects; 17 were excluded due demise post SFLP. Following SFLP, recipient (R) demonstrated an increase in MCA PI and a decrease in UA PI, with an increase in CPR. Donor (D) demonstrated a similar magnitude decrease in MCA PI and UA PI, yielding no change in CPR. Following SFLP, the mean CHOP CV Score decreased. The magnitude of change was greater in the subgroup with greater pre-SFLP cardiovascular burden (CHOP CV Score ≥ 6).
Improvement in CV burden is seen as early as 1-week post-SFLP, supporting acute alteration of loading conditions as a significant contributor. Further study of the trajectory of CV alterations may provide insight into the complex mechanisms underlying TTTS.

PMID:
40286065
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Apr 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 43
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement