Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Multi-objective optimization design for accelerated degradation test based on game theory.

Created on 28 Apr 2025

Authors

Jinyan Guo, Zhiwu Han, Shuangfeng Wu, Junqi Long, Chuanhai Chen, Zhifeng Liu

Published in

Scientific reports. Volume 15. Issue 1. Pages 14707. Apr 27, 2025. Epub Apr 27, 2025.

Abstract

Accelerated degradation test is an effective way for the rapid reliability assessment of mechanical systems. Most of the existing optimization methods for accelerated degradation tests aim to optimize objective functions with a single objective, which leads to inappropriate optimization results. To solve the problem, a multi-objective optimization design method is presented for accelerated degradation tests based on game theory in this work. First, the multi-objective optimization model is established to optimize the prediction precision of lifetime distribution, the estimation precision of model parameters, and the robustness of model parameter deviation under the constraint that the total experimental cost does not exceed the predetermined budget. Based on game theory, the multi-objective optimization model is transformed into a cooperative game problem. The fuzzy clustering method is applied to calculate the strategy space owned by each player. Each player considers the benefits of other players in the construction of its benefit function to form a collusive cooperation model. Under the condition of maximizing the collective interest, the multi-objective optimization model is solved to obtain a compromised optimal test plan which balances the multiple optimization objectives. Finally, the necessity and effectiveness of the proposed method have illustrated a group of examples of motorized spindles.

PMID:
40289131
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Apr 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 35
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement