Gurney and cylinder wall velocities of explosives: analytical estimates and thermochemical simulations.

Authors

Didier Mathieu

Published in

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP. May 02, 2025. Epub May 02, 2025.

Abstract

Gurney velocity (u_G) and cylinder wall velocity (v_s) of energetic materials are calculated using the semi-empirical Cγ method, an analytical model previously developed for CHNO high explosives and presently extended to additional elements and to explosives at low loading density. The results are compared to recent procedures based on thermochemical simulations. Regarding u_G, both approaches perform similarly well for organic high explosives, with an average relative error close to 2.6%. However, Cγ underestimates u_G for tritonal, an explosive with 20-40 wt% aluminium powder. Regarding v_s, a newly introduced empirical equation is shown to perform better than the Gurney model, although not as well as a recent correlation involving the detonation energy derived from thermochemical simulations, which are still required to predict cylinder wall velocities with optimal accuracy. With regard to the application of present models to the design of new materials, Cγ is not recommended for metal-containing compounds. However, for the high-thoughput design of organic high explosives, it is an invaluable tool allowing fast and reproducible calculations of Gurney energies with state-of-the-art accuracy. A very simple, hackable Python script is provided for this purpose as supplementary information.

PMID:
40314815
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 May 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.