Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Predicting growth parameters of biofertilizer inoculated pepper, using root capacitance assessments and artificial neural networks in two soils.

Created on 12 May 2025

Authors

Flórián Kovács, Peter Sarcevic, Ákos Odry, Borbála Biró, Ingrid Gyalai, Enikő Papdi, Katalin Juhos

Published in

Biologia futura. May 12, 2025. Epub May 12, 2025.

Abstract

Monitoring the root system plays an important role in understanding plant physiological processes; however, its assessment using non-destructive methods remains challenging. Here, we evaluate the utility of root capacitance (CR) as a practical indicator of root function and its relationship to plant growth parameters in Capsicum annuum L. To improve the accuracy of root function assessment, we applied artificial neural networks (ANN) as a novel data evaluation approach, comparing its predictive performance against multiple linear regression (MLR). Across two soil types (sandy and sandy loam), we applied multiple treatments ranging from microbial inoculants to wool pellet and inorganic nitrogen sources primarily to test whether CR could detect differences in root activity and biomass production under different conditions. We measured root dry biomass, shoot dry biomass, and leaf N content, treating these variables as independent predictors in a statistical framework. Multiple linear regression (MLR) initially showed strong relationship between CR and both root and shoot biomass in sandy soil, and between CR and total plant N content in sandy loam. However, an ANN model consistently outperformed MLR in predicting CR from plant physiological parameters, as evidenced by lower mean absolute error (MAE) in all treatments. These findings confirm that CR correlates strongly with plant growth parameters and can reliably distinguish the effects of different soil amendments even those with markedly different nutrient-release profiles.

PMID:
40353984
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 May 2025.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 29
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement